Happy Birthday to the Legal Information & Technology eJournal which just concluded its fifth year. This SSRN eJournal, curated by Randy Diamond and Lee Peoples, provides a platform for the dissemination of law library scholarship.
Beginning this year, the journal, which has heretofore been sponsored by the Academic Law Libraries Special Interest Section of the American Association of Law Libraries and the Mid-America Association of Law Libraries, will be self-sustaining.
I subscribe to this journal and frequently find many interesting and useful articles. Institutional and individual subscription information is available at http://www.ssrn.com/en/index.cfm/subscribe/. Note that many university departments and other institutions have purchased site subscriptions covering all various eJournals.
Here’s a sampling of some of the articles in the upcoming issue of the Legal Information & Technology eJournal:
- The Future of Digital Legal History: No Magic, No Silver Bullets
Eric C. Nystrom, Arizona State University
David S. Tanenhaus, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law
- Law Firm Legal Research Requirements in the Legal Academy Beyond Carnegie
Patrick Meyer, University of Detroit Mercy – School of Law
- Proceed with Extreme Caution: Citation to Wikipedia in Light of Contributor Demographics and Content Policies
Jodi Wilson, University of Memphis – Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law
- Native Advertising and Endorsement: Schema, Source-Based Misleadingness, and Omission of Material Facts
Chris Jay Hoofnagle, School of Information, University of California, Berkeley – School of Law, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology
Eduard Meleshinsky, Bryan Schwartz Law
- Transparency in Arbitrator Selection
Catherine A. Rogers, Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law
- Implementation of ECLI – State of Play
Marc van Opijnen, Publications Office of the Netherlands
Alexander Ivantchev, European Union – European Commission
- Access to Justice 2.0: Access to Legislation and Beyond
Yaniv Roznai, University of Haifa – The Minerva Center for the Rule of Law under Extreme Conditions, New York University – The Hauser Global Law School
Nadiv Mordechay, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, School of Law, Students
Warner/Chappell Music, a subsidiary of Warner Music Group, has long claimed to own the rights to “Happy Birthday to You,” probably the most recognized English language song in the world. However, new evidence unearthed by librarians at the University of Pittsburgh Law Library calls that claim into question.
According to PittLaw, Warner/Chappell’s claim is based on a 1935 copyright registration. But now an earlier 1922 publication of the song has come to light.
The fourth edition of The Everyday Song Book was published in 1922 and contains lyrics for “Happy Birthday To You” without any copyright notice, which predates Warner/Chappell’s 1935 copyright registration. According to The Hollywood Reporter, the plaintiffs discovered evidence of the book, a blurry photo in Warner/Chappell’s own files, which they were given access to only three weeks ago.
2015 has been a whirlwind year of change for UW Libraries, even though most of it is not obvious to users. The campus (and entire UW system!) recently switched our library catalog platform and modified several of our web discovery tools.
Zotero, a free and very helpful citation manager used by many Law School faculty and staff, was also recently updated and changed in Firefox. Instead of seeing a book icon (or folder, journal article, etc.) in your address bar, the Zotero translator tool is now located to the far right in your Firefox browser, as indicated in the screenshot below:
To save your item (book, article, website, etc.), click on the drop-down menu and select how you want the resource to be saved. It’s an easy-to-use upgrade, but one that was rolled out somewhat quietly.
All these changes, however, have caused one part of Zotero to go on the fritz. If you try to save a book, etc. from the UW library catalog, Zotero currently cannot detect all of the information about the item and so doesn’t know that it is saving information for a book or journal. It will simply try to save them item as a webpage…which leaves a lot of useful information behind.
The UW team is aware of the problem, but it may take some time to fix it as there are so many other changes to work through at this time. In the meantime, a helpful workaround is to go to Worldcat.org, a catalog of library materials worldwide, and locate your book, etc. there. You will be able to save your item with all of the important data and information quickly and easily.
If you have any problems or questions, feel free to contact either Kris or Bonnie and we’ll figure out a solution.
Two Wisconsin county law libraries have been renamed. The Dane Legal Resource Center will now be known as the Dane County Law Library and the Milwaukee Legal Resource Center is now the Milwaukee County Law Library.
From WSLL @ Your Service:
These new names give our users a better understanding of the legal information services we offer. Both county law libraries work extensively with legal service providers. Complimentary to that one-on-one assistance, the library provides convenient access to legal information and space to work right in each Courthouse.
Ok – this has nothing to do with law, but it was too good not to share. Headline from TIME: Someone Keeps Photocopying Their Cat at the University of Wisconsin Library.
From the post:
A staffer at the university’s Badger Herald newspaper stumbled upon the following photo while studying at the Steenbock Library Tuesday:
I had not heard about this until I saw the post in TIME. How funny. We’ll see if the cat-culprit makes his or her way to the Law Library.
There is a very interesting article in the June 2013 edition of the Georgetown Law Journal (101 Geo. L.J. 1171) about prison libraries. (available via Westlaw and LexisNexis)
From the abstract:
The prison law library has long been a potent symbol of the inmate’s right to access the courts. But it has never been a practical tool for providing that access. This contradiction lies at the core of the law library doctrine. It takes little imagination to see the problem with requiring untrained inmates, many of them illiterate or non-English speakers, to navigate the world of postconviction relief and civil rights litigation with nothing more than the help of a few library books…
This Article uses original historical research to show how prison law libraries arose, not as a means of accessing the courts, but rather as a means of controlling inmates’ behavior.
Curious about the meaning behind that last phrase, I took a closer look at the article. It seems that during the 1950’s, the law library that served Illinois’s prisons became so popular that in just a nine year period “inmates at the 4,400-man Stateville facility shot off 27,890 filings to the courts, not including those filed by their attorneys.” This apparently didn’t sit to well with some in the legislature and judiciary.
Author Jonathan Abel wondered, “with legislators and judges criticizing the law library, what could have motivated Stateville and Joliet Warden Joseph Ragen to let it grow so big? Not constitutional requirements. Not a sense for the future development of the law. No, it appears the warden had more practical reasons, at least according to the newspaper. Ragen said he was ‘not too unhappy’ with the situation because ‘the job of preparing petitions keeps the prisoners occupied.'” (p 1183)
Here’s more from the abstract
By placing the origin of the prison law library in the first decades of the twentieth century-half a century earlier than typical accounts-this Article shows how the law library evolved to take on a new purpose in the 1960s and 1970s, when the Supreme Court and other courts first began to fashion a law library doctrine.
The central argument of this Article is simple: The courts’ attempts to graft an access-to-courts rationale onto a law library system that had developed for other purposes led to a law library doctrine riddled with contradictions and doomed to failure. This historical account helps explain a prison law library system that never really made sense in terms of providing access to the courts.
Hat tip to Legal Research Plus
From the UW Madison Libraries:
Love the NCAA basketball tourney, but wish it was just a little more … bookish? You’re in luck. The UW-Madison Libraries are hosting our first annual Book Madness Tournament.
A brutal selection process resulted in a collection of 64 books – 8 divisions with 8 books each – going head-to-head to determine our favorite book.
Vote for your favorites in each round. Total votes will determine which books move on.
The eight divisions are:
In preparation for a session that I’m doing for some of our Legal Research and Writing students next week, I pulled together a list of Top Ten Things Law Librarians Wish Law Students Would Know or Do.
The list was first created by Betty Karweick for our Legal Research and Writing program years ago. I’ve updated the list for 2013 using suggestions from members of the Law Librarians Association of Wisconsin.
Today, the UW Madison libraries are releasing a new Library Catalog. It has been available for beta testing for some time, but today marks it’s official debut.
Here are some highlights:
- intuitive interface for fast discovery
- powerful limits and narrowing for all searches
- seamless portal to all UW System libraries
- easy access to your account information
- mobile friendly
The new catalog really is a great improvement over its predecessor, MadCat. It is more visually sleek and much more intuitive. I especially like the faceting that allows you easily narrow down your search. The new catalog was designed in house.
For more information about the new catalog, see the development blog called Moving Forward.
MadCat, the prior catalog, will continue to be available for those who prefer to use it. There is a link to it on the top right of the new catalog.